Amin Parsa
Affilierad forskare
Legal Tech, the Law Firm and the Imagination of the Right Legal Answer
Författare
Summary, in English
Legal tech is growing, and its growth provokes anxieties about the future of the legal profession as such. In this article, we examine the impact of legal tech on the central role of lawyers at law firms in crafting an imagined ‘right legal answer’ by drawing on Duncan Kennedy’s suggestion that a claim to the rightness of one’s legal propositions is a central characteristic of the legal profession. We first ask how changes in the organisation of legal services affect the ability of lawyers at law firms to produce that ‘right legal answer’. While legal tech only exacerbates already ongoing processes of eradication of routine tasks, we find that it continues to mask the role of ideology in arriving at a right legal answer under a new layer of technological projection. Second, we ask how lawyers’ ability to produce ‘the right legal answer’ is affected by, first, expert systems and, second, a legal tech application named Bryter, representing a no-code system. We find that expert systems do not permit to uphold the unity of the lawyer required for Kennedy’s model of the right legal answer, but that no-code systems as Bryter do so. No-code systems can be reduced to a slogan: Have the lawyer, but evict her ideological temptations more efficiently than before!
Avdelning/ar
- LU profilområde: Mänskliga rättigheter
- Folkrätt
- Mänskliga rättigheter
- Juridiska institutionen
Publiceringsår
2023-10-10
Språk
Engelska
Sidor
381-394
Publikation/Tidskrift/Serie
Law and Critique
Volym
34
Dokumenttyp
Artikel i tidskrift
Förlag
Springer
Ämne
- Law
Nyckelord
- Folkrätt
- Public international law
Aktiv
Published
Forskningsgrupp
- Public International Law
- Human Rights Law
ISBN/ISSN/Övrigt
- ISSN: 0957-8536