The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

Photo of John Woodlock by Emma Lord.

John Woodlock

Postdoctoral fellow

Photo of John Woodlock by Emma Lord.

Procedural justice for all? Legitimacy, just culture and legal anxiety in European civil aviation

Author

  • John Woodlock

Summary, in English

This article presents the results of survey-based research which explores if licensed aircraft maintenance engineers working in Norway, Sweden, and Portugal experience regulated “just culture” as procedural justice-infused processes when occurrence reporting in European Union (EU) civil aviation. Drawing on Tylerian procedural justice theory, the study finds that, perceived procedural justice is more strongly associated with legitimacy (perceived as support for rules and authority) than legal anxiety among the maintenance engineers. Country-based results reveal differences in engineers' legal experiences of occurrence reporting with perceived procedural justice strongest in Sweden and legal anxiety most influential in Portugal. The article contributes with a first exploration of “just culture” as a procedural justice-infused legal intervention to improve compliance to regulated occurrence reporting by negating legal anxiety in a European aviation context.

Department/s

  • Department of Sociology of Law

Publishing year

2022

Language

English

Pages

441-476

Publication/Series

Law and Society Review

Volume

56

Issue

3

Document type

Journal article

Publisher

John Wiley & Sons Inc.

Topic

  • Law and Society

Status

Published

ISBN/ISSN/Other

  • ISSN: 0023-9216